A comparative overview of STEM discipline-based public research funding in China and the United States

Patricia Akamp

Abstract


This paper aims to expose a narrow, yet relevant aspect of funding changes in higher education in China, through a discipline-based overview of the country’s public research funding. It makes specific comparisons with the United States (U.S.) in order to explore how research funding has changed in the first decade of the century in light of the worldwide trend of investment growth in the fields of science, technology, engineering and math (STEM), considering China’s centralized approach to service provision. Through documentary analysis, findings indicate that China did follow the trend of prioritizing STEM subjects for research funding, opposed to those in the social sciences, humanities and arts (SSHA), while aligning them to set economic goals (as seen in the last three Five-Year plans). Even though China and the U.S. have had separate drivers at different times to justify increased investment earmarked for STEM subject areas, both countries hold the common aspiration of being the scientific leading reference in the world, and their policies draw from the assumption that this can only be achieved through further development in science and technology, even if in detriment of funds for SSHA. However, from a discipline-based perspective, by following U.S.’ research funding policies, China may be creating dependency paths for SSHA, as already seen in the U.S.

Key words: research funding, China, U.S., SSHA, STEM, resource dependence theory.


Full Text:

PDF

References


AIT, UNU-Merit, SPI. (2014). STI China: Science, Technology and Innovation Performance of China.

Bonaccorsi, A. (2008). Search Regimes and the Industrial Dynamics of Science. Minerva, 46(3), 285-315 .

Bowl, M., & Hughes, J. (2016). Fair access and fee setting in English universities: what do institutional statements suggest about university strategiesin a stratified quasi-market? . Studies in Higher Education, 269-287.

Braun, D. (1998). The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science. Research Policy, 27 (8), 807-821.

Bray, N., & Major, C. (2011). Status of Journals in the Field of Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education, 82(4), 479-503 .

China Daily. (2012). China urged to seize on new tech revolution. Retrieved from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2012-10/30/content_15856766.htm

China Organization. (2000). Summary of the Tenth Five-Year Plan (2001-2005) – Information Industry. Retrieved from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan022769.pdf

China Organization. (2000). The 10th Five-Year Plan (2001-2005). China.org.cn. Retrieved from http://www.china.org.cn/english/MATERIAL/157629.htm

China Organization. (2016). What is the Five-Year Plan? Beijing: China.org.cn. Retrieved from http://www.china.org.cn/english/MATERIAL/157595.htm

Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Curley, M. (2016, May 19). Twelve principles for Open Innovation 2.0. Nature, pp. 314-316. Retrieved May 19, 2016, from http://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/1.19911!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/533314a.pdf

Davis, G. F., & Cobb, J. A. (2010). Resource dependence theory: Past and future. (C. B. Schoonhoven, & F. Dobbin, Eds.) Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 28, 21-42.

Etzkowitz, H. (1993). Technology transfer: The second academic revolution. Technology Access Report(6), 7-9.

European Commission. (2005). Mobilising the brainpower of Europe: enabling universities to make their full contribution to the Lisbon Strategy. Retrieved April 12, 2016, from http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/education_training_youth/lifelong_learning/c11078_en.htm

Fan, C. C. (2006). China’s Eleventh Five-Year Plan (2006–2010): From “Getting Rich First” to “Common Prosperity”. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 708–723. Retrieved from http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/geog/downloads/597/300.pdf

Fowles, J. (2014). Funding and Focus: Resource Dependence in Public Higher Education. Research in higher education, 272-287.

Freeman, C., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (Eds.). (1988). Small Countries Facing the Technological Revolution. London: Pinter Publishers.

Gerald, F. D., & Cobb, A. J. (2010). Resource dependence theory: Past and future. In C. B. Schoonhoven, & F. Dobbin (Eds.), Stanford's Organization Theory Renaissance (pp. 21-42). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage Publications.

Gulbrandsen, M. (2005). Tensions in the research council–research community relationship. Science and Public Policy, 32(3), 199-209.

Hong, C., Mo, L., Meng, Y., Tang, Y., Xia, X., He, Y., . . . Zhou, Z. (2011). Issues and Challenges on Knowledge Mobilization and Education Policy-making in China.

Humanities Indicators. (2014). Research and Development Expenditures at Colleges and Universities. American Academy of Arts & Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.humanitiesindicators.org/content/indicatordoc.aspx?i=86#

Jørgensen, J. T. (2015, 5 13). Doctoral Education in Europe. Podcast #1: Doctotal Education in Europe. (E. E. News, Interviewer) Retrieved from https://soundcloud.com/esna-media

Katsomitros, A. (2013). The global race for STEM skills. Retrieved from http://www.obhe.ac.uk/newsletters/borderless_report_january_2013/global_race_for_stem_skills

Li, M., & Yang, R. (2014). Governance reforms in higher education: A study of China. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).

Liu, S. (2015). Higher Education Quality Assessment in China: An Impact Study. Higher education policy, 175-195.

Liu, Y., Duan, Y., Xiao, G., & and Tang, L. (2011). S&T Policy Evolution: A comparison between the United States and China (1950-present). Science and Innovation Policy. Atlanta: Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy.

Maldonado-Maldonado, A. (2014). Peripheral knowledge-driven economies. What does academic capitalism have to say? In B. Cantwell, & I. Kauppinen (Eds.), Academic Capitalism in the Age of Globalization (pp. 187-207). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Mills, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

National Conference of State Legislature. (2015). Performance-based funding for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/performance-funding.aspx

National Science Board. (2015). Revisiting the STEM Workforce: A Companion to Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. Virginia: National Science Board. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2015/nsb201510.pdf

National Science Foundation. (2014). Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. Retrieved from Chapter 4. Research and Development: National Trends and International Comparisons: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/index.cfm/chapter-4/c4s.htm

Nisar, A. M. (2015). Higher education governance and performance based funding as an ecology of games. Higher Education, 1-22.

Nowotny, H. S. (2003). ‘Mode 2’ Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge. Minerva, 41, 179-194.

OECD. (2014). Gross Domestic Spending on R&D. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from https://data.oecd.org/rd/gross-domestic-spending-on-r-d.htm

Olsen, J. P. (2007). The Institutional Dynamics of the European University. In P. Maassen, & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University Dynamics and European Integration (pp. 25-54). Springer.

Ouma, G. W. (2011). Managing Resource Dependence Difficulties in African Higher Education: The Case of Multiple Exchange Relationships. Higher education policy, 167-184.

Pfeffer, J. (2003). Introduction to the classic edition. In J. Pfeffer, & G. R. Salancik, The External Control of organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (classic edition). Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row Co.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Classic edition ed.). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

Pilbeam, C. (2012). Pursuing financial stability: a resource dependence perspective on interactions between pro-vice chancellors in a network of universities. Studies in Higher Education, 415-429.

PRC. (2006). The 11th Five-Year Plan: targets, paths and policy orientation. Beijing: National Development and Reform Commission. Retrieved from http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/200603/t20060323_63813.html

PRC. (2014). List of Chinese Colleges and Universities in 2014. Beijing: Ministry of Education . Retrieved from http://www.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_2812/201409/175222.html

Reale, E., & Seeber, M. (2011). Drivers of Inequalities in Higher Education and the Unexpected Consequences of Equality Policies. Higher Education Policy, 185-211.

Scott, R. W. (2013). Organization Theory and Higher Education. The Journal of Organizational Theory in Education.

Shafritz, J. M., Ott, S. J., & Jang, Y. S. (2011). Classics of Organitational Theory (7th ed.). Belmont, California: Wadsworth.

Su, S. (2011). Property Ownership and Private Higher Education in China: Emerging Perspectives on Education in China Series. Lanham: Lexington Books.

The National Academy of Sciences. (1965). Basic Research and National Goals. Washington DC: US House of Representatives.

The Pew Charitable Trusts. (2015). Federal and State Funding of Higher Education: A Changing Landscape. Philadelphia: The Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved from http://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/assets/2015/06/federal_state_funding_higher_education_final.pdf

Turner, D. (2017). World Class Universities and the Rest. In K. Downing, & F. A. Ganotice Jr., World university rankings and the future of higher education (pp. 109-128). Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI.

U.S. (2011). Backgrounder: China's 12th Five Year Plan. Washington: China Economic & Security Review Commission. Retrieved from https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Research/12th-FiveYearPlan_062811.pdf

UNESCO. (2014). Higher Education in Asia: Expanding Out, Expanding Up. Montreal: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002275/227516e.pdf

United Nations Public Administration. (2001). China: Summary of the Tenth Five-Year Plan (2001-2005). Paris: UN. Retrieved from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan022769.pdf

Walker, I., & Zhu, Y. (2013). The Benefit of STEM Skills to Individuals, Society, and the Economy. London: Royal Society. Retrieved from https://royalsociety.org/~/media/education/policy/vision/reports/ev-9-vision-research-report-20140624.pdf

WebCASPAR. (2011). Integrated Science and Engineering Resources Data System. Retrieved from WebCASPAR: https://webcaspar.nsf.gov

Weerts, D. J. (2014). State Funding and the Engaged University: Understanding Community Engagement and State Appropriations for Higher Education . Review of Higher Education, 133-169.

Xinhua. (2011). Highlights of China’s Draft 12th Five-Year Plan. Beijing: English News. Retrieved from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-03/05/c_13762230.htm


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




© 2014 WPHES

ISSN 2411-2445